California Criminal Defense Lawyers

Joseph Hawkins Low IV is dedicated to fighting for the rights of the people. He has dedicated his legal career to fighting against the greed of corporate America; oppression by federal and state government, and the constant abuse by police and law enforcement agencies.

Mr. Low is the trial lawyer other lawyers call when they have a difficult case to take to trial. If you are in trouble and your freedom is on the line, you need an attorney who is not afraid to fight for you and your rights, a lawyer who is passionate about your situation, dedicated to your case and will NOT quit.

Below are some sample results Mr. Low has achieved on behalf of his clients. These results are reflective only of the individual cases Mr. Low has handled and are not indicative of results that can be obtained on any other criminal matter. The results obtained in each case are based on the facts of that particular matter.

California Criminal Case Results

  • Charge: Felony 245 "Aggravated assault with great bodily injury": Dismissed at trial
  • Charge: Felony Rape with prior: NOT Guilty
  • Charge: 3rd DUI: Dismissed
  • Charge: Illegal Weapon Possession (Felony): Dismissed
  • Charge: Domestic Violence (Felony), Assault with a Deadly Weapon (Felony), Illegal Weapon Possession (Felony), Battery (Felony), Drug Under the Influence (Felony): All Dismissed
  • Charge: Rape and Adultery: Dismissed
  • Charge: Indecent Exposure: Dismissed
  • Charge: Lewd act: Dismissed
  • Charge: Domestic violence: Dismissed
  • Charge: Assault: Dismissed
  • Charge: Battery: Dismissed
  • Charge: Sexual assault: Dismissed
  • Charge: Rape: Dismissed
  • Charge: Sexual assault: Dismissed
  • Charge: Rape: Dismissed
  • Trial: Child Molestation, Committing a Lewd Act Upon a Child; Result: Not Guilty
  • Trial: Sexual Assault; Result: Charge dismissed after Mr. Low picks jury
  • Trial: Resisting Arrest - Mr. Low comes in after trial already started; Result: Hung 11-1 for Not Guilty. Case Dismissed
  • Charge: Attempted murder; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: Insurance fraud; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: Resisting Arrest; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: Assault/Battery on a Police Officer; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: 4 counts of Sexual Assault & Battery; Result: All Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 148 - Resisting arrest; Result: Not Guilty
  • Charge: P.C. 243 - Assault and battery with injury on police officer; Result: Not Guilty
  • Charge: P.C. 148; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 148; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 243 - Assault & Battery on an officer; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 273.5 - Domestic Violence (felony); Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 273(a) - Child abuse; Result: Not Guilty
  • Charge: P.C. 273.5 - Wife beating; Result: Hung Jury 8 to 4 for Not Guilty
  • Charge: 187 - Murder; Result: Not Guilty
  • Charge: Second degree murder; Result: Not Guilty
  • Charge: Manslaughter; Result: Not guilty
  • Charge: Pimping and Pandering; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: Prostitution; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: Solicitation for Prostitution; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: Prostitution; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: Grand Theft Auto; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: 11550 - Under the influence of drugs; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: 11377 - Possession of drugs; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: 11378 - Sales of drugs; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: PC 243 - Battery on a police officer 3 counts; Result: All Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 273.5 - Felony with priors; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: Making Terrorist Threats; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: Assault with a deadly weapon with prior; Result: No jail, probation
  • Charge: P.C. 273.5 with serious injury; Result: Dismissed at trial
  • Charge: Solicitation for Prostitution; Result: Dismissed on day of trial
  • Charge: P.C. 273.5 - Domestic Violence; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: 23152 - DUI; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: V.C. 23152 - DUI; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 273.5 - Domestic Violence; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: 23152 - DUI; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 273.5 - Domestic Violence; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: V.C. 23152 - DUI; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 273.5 - Domestic Violence; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: 23152 - DUI; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: V.C. 23152 - DUI; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 148 - Resisting Arrest; Result: Dismissed at trial
  • Charge: 23152 - DUI; Result: Case Dismissed
  • Charge: V.C. 23152 - DUI; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: D.U.I. with a .15 alcohol level; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: 12020(a) - Carrying a Concealed Weapon; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: 11358 - Possession of Illegal Substance; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: PC 243 - Battery on a police officer; Trial 11 to 1 Not Guilty - DA Dismissed
  • Charge: PC 148 - Resisting arrest; Result: DA Dismissed at trial
  • Charge: Growing and Sales of Marijuana; Result: DA Dismissed at preliminary hearing
  • Charge: Sexual Battery w/Sex Offender; Result: Dismissed during jury selection
  • Charge: P.C. 148 - Resisting arrest; Result: Dismissed
  • Charge: Assault and Battery with great bodily harm. Defendant had 1 prior conviction for the same; Result: Case dismissed at trial.
  • Theft of Auto/Receiving stolen property; Result: Case dismissed after preliminary hearing.
  • Charge: 9 Counts of Sexual Assault: Result: Dismissed-No jail, no fine
  • Charge: Assault and Battery; Domestic Violence; Result: Case Dismissed at on 9th Day of trial.
  • P.C. 215(a) – Carjacking: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 211 – 2nd Degree Robbery: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 182(a)(1) – Conspiracy to Commit a Crime: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 12021(a)(1) – Possession of a Firearm by a Felon: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 148- Resisting Arrest: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 207 - Kidnapping: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 273.6 -Violating Court Order: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 261 - Rape: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 215(a) – Carjacking: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 211 – 2nd Degree Robbery: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 182(a)(1) - Conspiracy to Commit a Crime: Dismissed
  • Charge: P.C. 12021(a)(1) - Prior Conviction Probation Violation, possession of a firearm: Dismissed

International Criminal Case Results

  • Charge: 21 Counts of Sexual Assault; Result: Not Guilty

Recent Win On Murder Case

As TLC's instruction in "Discovering the Story" teaches us, good trial work begins long before the actual commencement of trial. In fact, good trial work is extraordinarily difficult without a thorough, thoughtful and connective workup of your case. There are times, however, when the thorough, thoughtful and connective workup of your case renders good trial work completely unnecessary.

A great example of that appears in Joey Low's day in court today. Joey represented a woman who was charged with murdering her husband. The woman had assisted her husband in his suicide; the so-called "victim" had cancer of the tongue. Although his treatment had succeeded, it was a scorched-earth situation wherein the aftermath of the treatment left him alive but miserable, and wanting to die. On his request, his wife gave him a cocktail of prescription medication in a dosage sufficient to take his life.

The police arrested Joey's client on the same night as her husband's death. She never had time to grieve and mourn the loss of her husband of 33 years - - unless one counts her tearful videotaped confession to the police.

Joey was not the first attorney whom this woman contacted. Her first choice of a lawyer told her that the only recourse was to beg the D.A. for a plea. Unwilling to plead into prison, the woman hired Joey, and turned Joey loose on the government's motivations in prosecuting this woman for helping her husband end his suffering.

Joey rifle-sighted the coroner who had classified this death as a murder. As the coroner had worked in that capacity for over 40 years and had testified well over 500 times, there was an overwhelming volume of material to review in order to dig into the coroner's personal history. Joey took the time to read it, and learned that in the classes the coroner took to develop the foundation for his cause-of-death opinions, the coroner only earned a "D." In previous jobs, the coroner had been booted off of all murder cases because of his poor performance and questionable results. The coroner had admitted to this demotion in one of his previous 500 trials.

In this case, Joey reconstructed the coroner's work, minute-by-minute. He learned that the coroner had spent maybe 15 minutes analyzing the husband's body. The coroner had actually estimated time of death to be at a moment when Joey could prove that the husband was still living. And most importantly, Joey found that the coroner had originally ascribed the cause of death to be either pneumonia or a myocardial infarc - - the coroner changed his report, only after Joey's client was charged with murder.

The digging was not all Joey did, however. He retained and prepared four experts who would address the coroner's claims: a pharmaceutical representative, who would testify that the manufacturer's data showed the drug levels in the husband's body to be non-lethal; a professor of forensic pathology who would have testified that the coroner had conducted inapposite, inappropriate tests; a cancer expert who would have described the husband's treatment program and prognosis for quality of life; and a psychological expert who would have testified that Joey's client lacked the mental capacity to understand her rights, waive her rights and give an accurate statement.

Joey presented this case in three separate mock trials to hone the themes of the case. He was prepared to present photographs showing his client's marriage to her husband, and he had prepared his client to testify about the meaning of "in sickness and in health, 'till death do us part." And in accordance with court rules, Joey had put the D.A. on notice of his experts and their testimony. Joey had also suggested that the D.A. might want to do half as much investigation into the coroner's history as he had done.

It is fun to think of what the trial would have been like, had Joey been taken off of his chain in front of a jury in this case - - but there is something even sweeter about seeing the government throw up its hands and sigh, "forget it, we give up, life's too short." The D.A. saw the proverbial writing on the wall and, after answering that she was "ready" for trial, asked the judge for a sidebar.

There, the D.A. announced that she was dismissing the case, due to her lack of evidence sufficient to prove the allegations.

One can only imagine how emotional the ensuing moments were, for Joey's client and for Joey himself. Recall also that Joey was making his final preparations for trial while also attending the argument of his case to the United States Supreme Court. Not too shabby for a week's work, Joey - - congratulations, great job and may your client find some peace.

Show Joey some love. He has had a hell of a week... and it's only Monday.

Maren C.
Scottsbluff, Nebraska

THE RIGHT CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER MAY BE YOUR BEST DEFENSE AGAINST SPENDING THE REST OF YOUR LIFE IN JAIL.

South Bay Criminal Defense Attorneys Disclaimer: The criminal defense, drunk driving, DUI, felony, misdemeanor, white collar crime, military law, courts martial, domestic violence, sex crime, DWI, juvenile crime, federal offense or other criminal defense information presented on this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results portrayed here were dependent on the facts of a particular legal matter and results vary from case to case. Please contact Joseph H. Low IV for a consultation on your particular California criminal defense case. This firm is licensed to practice law only in the State of California, but is affiliated with licensed attorneys in other states across the Nation. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the State of California.

Copyright © 2008 The Law Firm of Joseph H. Low, IV - Attorneys for The People - California Criminal Defense Attorneys - DUI Lawyers - White Collar Crimes and Domestic Violence Defense - Federal and Military Lawyers serving Beverly Hills, Sacramento, San Francisco, Santa Clara, Fresno, Bakersfield, Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, the Inland Empire and the communities of the South Bay including, Carson, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale, Lomita, Long Beach, Manhattan Beach, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, San Pedro, South Bay, Torrance and Wilmington. All rights reserved.

Website and Legal Internet Marketing by SLS Consulting | Sitemap